The value of a intimate harassment case depends on a number of factors. First, we look at the hardship of the sexual harassment. Second, we look at the amount of time you had to bear the intersexual harassment.
$300,000 In Punitive Damages Upheld In Sexual Harassment Case Despite Nominal Damages Award - Employment and HR - United States
) Angela Aguilar who worked in a copper explosive device for approximately 11 months claimed she was sexually harassed, retaliated against, subjected to knowing pain of emotional adversity and was constructively terminated from her employment. After an eight-day trial, the committee found ASARCO nonresistant on Aguilar's sexual harassment claims in wrongdoing of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act but not on her inferential termination or retaliation claims. ASARCO argued in this solicitation that the 300,000-to-1 ratio of punitive to countervailing damage profaned its due operation rights low-level do not apply to exercise discrimination claims brought under Title VII. The commission awarded Aguilar $1 in minimal damages and $868,750 in punitive damages. The regime likewise famous that the dominion court had instructed the panel that it could not prize more than $1 in nominal damage to Aguilar.
PunitiveDamages for SexualHarassment, Quirky Question # 56 | Quirky Questions
: Our company is committed to eliminating sexual harassment. We experience a well-defined intimate harassment policy that is enclosed in our employee handbook. We as well have conducted training sessions on a bi-annual component to ensure our employees understand our company’s position on unisexual harassment.